Coming To A Neighborhood Near You Soon

[John Thomas8]

You can tell the morons by their inability to post like normal people.

[Judy]

You can tell the morons by their inability to post like normal people.

You mean like you and 7gungrabbernormalliar7? Who would want to post like that?

[John Thomas8]

You can tell the morons by their inability to post like normal people.

You mean like you and 7gungrabbernormalliar7? Who would want to post like that?

Of course you wouldn't know about posting facts, you never do.

Of course you wouldn't understand that posting long lists of inordinately inane stupid shit rather than a link to the list is very, very bad form.

Of course you do not understand how forums work and thus fail your entire posting time to post threads to the appropriate section and whine like a moron when other people do.

[Judy]

You can tell the morons by their inability to post like normal people.

You mean like you and 7gungrabbernormalliar7? Who would want to post like that?

Of course you wouldn't know about posting facts, you never do.

Of course you wouldn't understand that posting long lists of inordinately inane stupid shit rather than a link to the list is very, very bad form.

Of course you do not understand how forums work and thus fail your entire posting time to post threads to the appropriate section and whine like a moron when other people do.

So posting the "long list" of guns and related devices banned by HR 1022 isn't posting a "fact"?

Posting the "long list" of the names of the federal official gun-grabbers isn't posting "facts"?

Posting the "long list" of guns that the "long list" of federal official gun-grabbers want to take away isn't "appropriate" on a thread about gun-grabbers taking guns away?



Oh wait! I GET IT NOW! You're just mad that my posting the "long lists" of "appropriate" "facts" on the "appropriate" thread proved 7gungrabbernormaliar7 is a liar and a fool, and now you're attacking the poster who did it.



That is very very "bad form"on your part, John, very very very very bad. Bad. Bad. Bad.

[7rob7]

The Assault Weapons Ban -- which expired six years ago -- grabbed no one's guns.

Renewing it will grab no one's guns.

No one has yet posted evidence of any Federal official officially trying to grab a single gun from a single legal gun owner in America.

And no one will be able to, either, since it is nothing more than an hysterical paranoid fantasy.

[Judy]

The Assault Weapons Ban -- which expired six years ago -- grabbed no one's guns.

Renewing it will grab no one's guns.

No one has yet posted evidence of any Federal official officially trying to grab a single gun from a single legal gun owner in America.

And no one will be able to, either, since it is nothing more than an hysterical paranoid fantasy.

This is fascinating.

First, 7gungrabbernormalliar7 claims there is no such thing as a "gun-grabber" and when Sam provides a very very long list of gun-grabbers that comprise a portion of the anti-gun lobby in America, then he revised his claim to exclude all the gun-grabbers on Sam's list and limits his claim to "Federal officials trying to take someone's guns away".

Second, when I post a link to Federal legislations passed and proposed by Federal officials trying to take someone's guns away, he says the links don't list anyone trying to take someone's guns away.

Third, when I post the long lists from the links that list the guns to be taken away and the names of the Federal officials trying to take the gun's away, he revised his claim to excludes all the someones who are not "legal gun owners" whose guns have already been taken away by the gun-grabbers, proving beyond any doubt whatsoever that gun-grabbers exist and they not only have taken many someones guns away, they want to take more guns away from more someones, because that is what a gun-grabber is and that's what they live to do.

Quicksand. They never ever see it.

[7rob7]

The idiotic term "gun grabber" refers to Federal officials trying to pass legislation that will force government law enforcement officers to break into people' homes and "grab" their guns. That is what the NRA hysterics mean when they use it, that is what the tea baggers mean when they use it, that is what the rest of the unhinged conservative fringe means when they use it, that is what Catus Magnus means when he uses it.

I'll repeat for the chronically stupid: no one is trying to take your guns away from you. Especially the Federal government.

What few anti-gun groups there are in American are powerless and ineffective. If you think they have any influence in getting gun confiscation laws passed, you know less than a first-grader.

So I'll repeat -- again for the deliberately dumb -- there are no gun grabbers coming to grab your guns.

[Sam]

So I'll repeat -- again for the deliberately dumb -- there are no gun grabbers coming to grab your guns.

...right at the moment..., no. There are none coming to grab any guns.

Now, for those who deliberately have their head in the sand..., consider England.

[Judy]

The idiotic term "gun grabber" refers to Federal officials trying to pass legislation that will force government law enforcement officers to break into people' homes and "grab" their guns. That is what the NRA hysterics mean when they use it, that is what the tea baggers mean when they use it, that is what the rest of the unhinged conservative fringe means when they use it, that is what Catus Magnus means when he uses it.

I'll repeat for the chronically stupid: no one is trying to take your guns away from you. Especially the Federal government.

What few anti-gun groups there are in American are powerless and ineffective. If you think they have any influence in getting gun confiscation laws passed, you know less than a first-grader.

So I'll repeat -- again for the deliberately dumb -- there are no gun grabbers coming to grab your guns.

The term "gun-grabber" is anyone lobbying to ban guns on the federal, state or local level, which includes citizens, officials, lobbying organizations, government and elected representatives.

And there are numerous proposals in state legislatures and Congress, and all types of city and county ordinances in play now. Do they have much support? No, not really. Americans love their 2nd Amendment and more are waking up to its importance every day. Did the US Supreme Court put the gun-grabbers in their place with their DC Gun Ban Ruling last year? Why yes they did. Have the gun-grabbers given up? No, they haven't. They're still there plotting and proposing and buying up politicians. So the anti-gun-grabbers have to plot and buy up more politicians than the gun-grabbers do. That's how Americans protect their 2nd Amendment rights.

Join the NRA.

http://home.nra.org/#/home