so pardon me if I take the word of the people who're dealing with the costs of the boycott
Sigh...So would if they would identify themselves.
I'm sure the Chamber of Commerce can prove their figures.
so pardon me if I take the word of the people who're dealing with the costs of the boycott
7rob7 wrote:No deflection detected.
Sure there is. I provided two different news stories from two different sources detailing the severity of the economic repercussions AZ is feeling because of its racist, illegal anti-immigrant law. Attempting to ignore the facts because the sources in one story weren't identified is deflection, pure and simple.
The "expert" in the second article was named, and said the boycott is having the same effect. Where's your deflection now?
I bet you missed the part, too, where AZ has pumped hundreds of thousands of dollars into a PR blitz trying to pretend their is no economic impact. That the infamous liars at the Chamber of Commerce have their hands in it, too... did you miss that part as well?
We already know that Faux "News" is demonstrably the least trustworthy media blot out there, so pardon me if I take the word of the people who're dealing with the costs of the boycott and not that of those whose mission is to deny those costs.
I'm sure the Chamber of Commerce can prove their figures.
They've been lying their asses off for years now about energy reform, insurance reform, and financial reform,
The fact that the quotes weren't attributed in the EarthTimes article is meaningless: we don't know if that was decided on by the source, the reporter, or the editor.
A spokesman for the Arizona Hotel and Lodging Association told the Phoenix-based Arizona Republic, the state's largest newspaper,
The CoC is a demonstrable liar, as I both stated and documented.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest